According to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, MLBPA head Tony Clark led a Monday conference call to discuss with players . The call included more than 130 MLB players with all 30 teams being represented. According to Sherman, the call spanned more than three hours and included plenty of questions and recommendations from players.
Nationals right-hander and union member Max Scherzer on Wednesday night that players have “no reason to engage with MLB in any further compensation reductions.” This reflects the union’s position that compensation for 2020 was a settled matter as of the March agreement in which they agreed to pro-rate their salaries based on the number of games played. Scherzer further called on MLB to release the relevant financials that would show the extent of projected revenue losses for 2020.
- Extensive health and safety protocols for players and team personnel
- Larger rosters (potentially 30-man active rosters and a 20-player taxi squad)
- Universal designated hitter
- Regional schedule to reduce travel (ex: teams in the AL East would only play each other and teams in the NL East)
As expected, per MLB Network’s Jon Heyman, and might decide they are also done negotiating.. Union chief Tony Clark invited commissioner Rob Manfred to schedule the season and “tell us when and where,” so the players can report. The MLBPA sent MLB a scathing letter accusing them of “underhanded tactics to circumvent the union” and “one delay tactic after another.” The March agreement allows Manfred to unilaterally schedule a season of any length as long as the players are paid full prorated salaries. The MLBPA has demanded MLB inform the union of its plans no later than Monday. Owners are set to have a Monday conference call,
June 17: Manfred, Clark meet; owners make new proposal
The league and union officially started talks May 12. Even so, the league reportedly did not present its revenue-sharing plan to the union on the first day. The union has pushed back on an altered agreement, stating its belief that a March deal between the two sides — one that gave players prorated salaries dependent on the number of games played in 2020 — settled the pay issue. After an unproductive meeting on Tuesday, the two sides are not negotiating on Wednesday, per multiple reports (including from Bob Nightengale of USA Today). Bear in mind, there’s still time to get a deal in place for a regular season that starts in early July. Nightengale notes that there’s not a hard deadline and the negotiations could stretch into the first week of June. Major League Baseball and the Players Association (MLBPA) have been negotiating for more than five weeks about a possible return-to-play plan for a 2020 season. Talks have often been contentious — especially over salary — but there was a renewed sense of optimism on Wednesday. A meeting between commissioner Rob Manfred and MLBPA chief Tony Clark has raised hopes that the two sides are headed for a negotiated settlement.
June 15: Manfred changes tune, says he’s ‘not confident’
In interviews with MLB Network and ESPN prior to Wednesday’s MLB draft, commissioner Rob Manfred said it’s “100 percent” that a 2020 season will take place. Manfred went on to say that he hopes a negotiated settlement between his side and the players is the ultimate outcome, but he also indicated that he would mandate a structure of the season if owners and the union are unable to reach an agreement. The March 26 accord gives Manfred the power to implement a regular season structure so long as bargaining has been in good faith (as always, that’s a matter of interpretation). If it comes to that, then Manfred would likely implement a regular season of 48-50 games.
On Tuesday, the MLBPA responded to MLB’s latest plan with a proposal that includes an 89-game season with full prorated pay and an expanded 16-team postseason in 2020 and 2021. This proposed season would run from July 10 to Oct. 11 and presumably push the postseason into November, something MLB wants to avoid for several reasons (second COVID-19 wave, new broadcast deals, etc.). Also, the proposal calls for a million fund to help minor leaguers and social justice organizations. “We’re nowhere,” an ownership person told MLB Network’s Jon Heyman after the proposal was submitted.
June 13: MLBPA rejects latest offer, tells MLB to schedule season
Meantime, Charles Gasparino of Fox Business Network tweets that MLB owners have scheduled a Tuesday meeting with commissioner Rob Manfred at 1 p.m. ET in advance of presenting their second proposal to players.
June 12: Owners make another offer
While no agreement has yet been reached and there’s still time for things to fall apart, don’t be surprised if something emerges along these lines:
June 10: Manfred guarantees season
Player compensation has been identified as one of the two big issues the sides have to resolve. The other is the safety of the players and other essential personnel. Over the weekend, The Athletic published highlights from a 67-page safety and testing protocol the league submitted to the union. The memo included MLB’s plans for testing, travel, and other pertinent topics.
June 9: MLBPA proposes 89-game season without extra pay cut
. In the union proposal, the 2020 MLB season would consist of 114 games from June 30 to Oct. 31. Other key parts of the plan include every player having the right to opt out of participating in a 2020 season and a salary deferral plan in the event that the postseason is canceled or shortened due to another wave of COVID-19. The proposal also calls for two years of expanded playoffs, and for the players to receive a 0 million advance during the second spring training.
June 8: MLB proposes 76-game season, still wants extra pay cut
Sources tell Bob Nightengale of USA Today that commissioner Rob Manfred and MLB attorneys plan to present their formal economic plan to the union by Friday. In that presentation, MLB will further detail the financial losses the league claims it will incur during the 2020 season. The league previously claimed that teams would suffer a combined loss of roughly billion with no fans in attendance if players declined to accept another salary reduction. However, .
June 4: Players ‘resoundingly reject’ additional pay cuts
While an agreement has not been reached, there are some notable components of various proposals that the two sides seem likely to be used in a 2020 season. They include:
June 3: MLB rejects MLBPA’s proposal; won’t make counteroffer
In a memo to players, the MLBPA said it is weighing the nature of its response to MLB’s economic proposal that “sought additional pay cuts of more than 0 million that it contends are necessary to make it economically feasible to play games without fans,” according to The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal. “Importantly, the union still awaits key documents from MLB that would support the dubious financial distress claims the league has made in its attempt to force the additional givebacks from players,” the memo adds.
June 1: MLB willing to pay prorated salaries in shorter season
In a statement, MLBPA director Tony Clark saysthe idea of taking a further pay cut and remain firm on calling for prorated salaries for the 2020 season. Clark’s statement noted that “the overwhelming consensus of the board is that players are ready to report, ready to get back on the field, and they are willing to do so under unprecedented conditions that could affect the health and safety of not just themselves, but their families as well.”
May 31: MLBPA proposes 114-game season, no additional pay cuts
While matters such as the structure of the season and the safety measures that will be put into place must also be agreed to, the economic issues figure to be toughest negotiation and have the greatest potential to be a genuine impasse to a deal.
May 29: MLBPA waiting for evidence of ‘dubious’ financial claims
Tampa Bay Rays left-handed Blake Snell made headlines by publicly reacting to the league’s proposed 50-50 revenue split during a Twitch stream. Snell said the risk of contracting COVID-19 is “just not worth it” while noting that the players had already agreed to a previous pay reduction.
May 27: Scherzer speaks out; players could ask for longer season
“The union has spent the past several days carefully reviewing the manual and gathering feedback from its medical experts and players across the league, including a 3 1/2 hour video conference with 100-plus player leaders on Monday night.”
While the MLBPA waits for the owners’ next proposal, Chuck Garfien of NBC Sports Chicago reports that . Doing so would provide teams some of the financial relief that they seek in these negotiations and is another signal that neither side is yet entrenched in current negotiating positions. The union is said to be disappointed by the proposal, which includes “massive” pay cuts beyond the prorated salaries they agreed to in March. The players will now review the proposal and counter. The two sides met Tuesday afternoon, but their next meeting is not yet scheduled.
May 26: Owners make financial proposal; MLBPA ‘disappointed’
The MLBPA issued the following statement Thursday afternoon, per ESPN’s Jeff Passan.
On that front, source tells Evan Drellich of The Athletic that owners will present players with a revised economic proposal on Tuesday. Presumably, owners will move off their original proposal, but the extent to which they do will of course determine whether this latest offer leads directly to an agreement. Teams will need at least two or three weeks to prepare for an early July start to the season, so the window of negotiation isn’t a wide one. Some forward momentum toward a deal is needed, and this second proposal could be just that.
May 24: Players reportedly expected to ask for deferrals
At the very least, this is the biggest cause for optimism in some time when it comes to these negotiations. Manfred has the ability to implement a season, and the MLBPA invited him to do so over the weekend. The MLBPA rejected the league’s latest proposal on Saturday and told owners its side was done negotiating. Manfred had previously guaranteed that a season would be played, but after that final rejection he walked back those comments. Pessimism prevailed until Wednesday, when negotiations sprang back to life.
May 22: MLB to present new economic proposal on Tuesday
, taking the next formal step in the negotiating process. According to Jared Diamond of the Wall Street Journal, the union’s counter-proposal included notes on testing frequency, protections for high-risk players and their families, and sanitization protocols.
San Diego Padres catcher and union rep Austin Hedges is optimistic about an agreement happening. “Over the last 48 hours, it really feels like we’re getting some stuff done,” he told Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune on Tuesday. Hedges believes the players and owners need to recognize that both sides will have to sacrifice in 2020 for the long-term health of the league. If that happens, then they should be able to find enough common ground to make a deal.
May 21: Union responds to MLB proposal
Prior to the start of their negotiations with the union, the owners approved a plan that would include an 82-game season, expanded rosters, and an expanded postseason that would include 14 teams. The plan also calls for the aforementioned 50-50 revenue split between the owners and players.
This is expected to be an important few days for the negotiations. On Tuesday, . Essentially, the players who earn the most will be asked to take a larger pay reduction than those who make less. The players could also earn more money based on postseason revenue.
Following Monday’s call, commissioner Rob Manfred said he is “not confident” there will be a 2020 season during an ESPN interview. That comes less than a week after he guaranteed there would be baseball this year. MLB also wants the MLBPA to waive the right to a grievance before scheduling a season.
May 20: MLB presents formal proposal to players
Baseball’s owners claim they’ll be losing 0,000 per game without fans in the seats during an 82-game season. There’s no way of verifying those numbers, given the closed-book nature of professional sports accounting. Still, the above figure is one of the reasons the owners are pushing for players to agree to further pay reductions as part of a 50-50 revenue split.
May 20: Players reviewing safety proposal
As the talks continue and more information becomes public, we’ve opted to construct a timeline of consequential news and events surrounding these talks. Below you’ll find all you need to know about the state of the negotiations, and how they got there.
May 19: Hedges ‘very confident’ season will happen
The owners have made another proposal to the players and given a Sunday night deadline for the players to respond. It is, once again, very likely to be a non-starter for the players. The owners have offered a 72-game season with the players getting 70 percent of their prorated salaries and 80 percent if the postseason is able to be completed. The players continue to press for full prorated salaries while the owners continue to try and only pay the players for roughly 50 games, regardless of how many games actually get played.
May 18: Owners claim they’ll lose $640,000 per game
MLB owners took a substantial step toward a deal on Monday as it was reported they were willing to, something the two sides agreed to back in March. This agreement would see the players earn a percentage of their full 2020 salaries based on the number of games played (ex: they would get 50 percent of their salary in an 81-game season). However, in an effort to save money, owners are proposing a season in the neighborhood of 50 games, a far cry from the 114-game slate proposed by players. But it seems likely the two sides can meet in the middle on the length of a season.
May 16: Safety protocol proposal leaks
The league delivered itsto the Players Association on Monday, but it doesn’t seem to be much different than previous ones. MLB is reportedly giving the MLBPA three days to give a response. In this proposal, the league calls for a 76-game regular season that would end on Sept. 27 with a postseason finishing up at the end of October. Also included in the league’s proposal: 75 percent prorated salaries, playoff pool money and no MLB draft pick compensation for signing players. It’s being reported that the union thinks the league’s latest offer is even worse than its previous proposals.
May 14: Snell reacts on Twitch
MLB owners held a conference call Monday afternoon to discuss a potential 2020 season. According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, owners and the MLBPA still have to negotiate specific health and safety protocols before they can make a determination on the length of the season.
May 14: Players likely to agree to universal DH
that would have featured a 114-game season and an expanded postseason, according to Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic. The league is not expected to make a counteroffer. The owners would prefer a shorter regular season with an assurance that the postseason will be completed before November, and before a potential second wave of the novel coronavirus sweeps the country.
May 12: No talks of money on Day 1
MLB commissioner Rob Manfred and MLBPA head Tony Clark recently had a productive face-to-face meeting, and shortly thereafter owners reportedly made a revised proposal to the union. Critically, MLB owners finally agreed to pay players their pro-rated salaries, as they initially agreed to do in late March. Players may also agree to drop their pending grievance against owners and sign on to expanded playoffs, which is a priority for ownership.
May 11: Owners reach agreement
Although it’s relatively small beans, the players are likely to agree to a universal DH for the 2020 season. The thinking is, ostensibly, that pitchers would stay healthier if they were relieved of their hitting and running obligations. The season is expected to be played with expanded rosters, and the DH would allow teams to find at-bats for players who might otherwise go without.